摘要:
目的 比较舍尼通和前列康治疗慢性前列腺炎的疗效。方法 选择门诊确诊的慢性前列腺炎病人,随机分为两组:治疗组76例,年龄(34±13)a,用舍尼通1片,bid;对照组64例,年龄(33±15)a,用前列康4片(0.5g/片),tid.疗程均为30d.观察病人主观症状及前列腺液的变化。结果 舍尼通组治愈率38.2%,总有效率89.5%;前列康组治愈率21.9%,总有效率76.5%,两者总有效率差别有显着意义(P<0.05).舍尼通对尿频、下腹部及会阴部疼痛的效果优于前列康。结论 舍尼通对慢性前列腺炎的总有效率及对尿频、下腹部疼痛、会阴部疼痛的疗效优于前列康。
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficiency of cernilton and conprata pulean in the treatment of chronic prostatitis.METHODS One hundred and forty patients with chronic prostatitis were randomly divided into 2 groups.76 patients of treatment group(age 34a±13a)were treated with cernilton 1 tablet,po,bid,64 patients of control group(age 33a±15a)were treated with conprata pulean 2.0g,po,tid.All patients received 30 days treatment as a course.RESULTS The cure rates and total effective rates were 38.2% and 89.5% in the former group and 21.9% and 76.5% in the later group(P<0.05).Further more,the effects of cernilton on frequent micturition,underbelly ache and perineal ache were better than those of conprata pulean.CONCLUSION Cernilton has a better efficiency than conprata pulean in the treatment of chronic prostatitis.
点击查看大图
下载:
